CDIO and the European Project Semester: a match for capstone projects?

CDIO and the European Project Semester: a match for capstone projects?

B. Malheiro, M. Silva, P. Ferreira, P. Guedes (2015).  CDIO and the European Project Semester: a match for capstone projects?. 12.

The CDIO Initiative is an open innovative educational framework for engineering graduation degrees set in the context of Conceiving – Designing – Implementing – Operating real-world systems and products [1], which is embraced by a network of worldwide universities, the CDIO collaborators (http://www.cdio.org). A CDIO compliant engineering degree programme, e.g. [2], typically includes a capstone module on the final semester, which can be a project, a professional internship or a combination of both. The purpose of this module is to expose students to problems of a greater dimension and complexity than those faced throughout the degree programme as well as to put them in contact with the so-called real world, in opposition to the academic world. However, even in the CDIO context, there are some barriers that tend to separate engineering capstone students from the real world context of an engineer professional: (i) limited interaction with experts from diverse scientific areas; (ii) reduced cultural and scientific diversity within the teams; and (iii) lack of a project supportive framework to foster the complementary technical and non-technical skills required in an engineer professional. To address these shortcomings, this paper proposes the adoption of the European Project Semester (EPS) framework [3], a one semester student-centred international capstone programme offered by a group of European engineering schools, the EPS Providers (http://www.europeanprojectsemester.eu), as part of their student exchange programme portfolio. EPS complies with the CDIO directives on Design-Implement Experiences5 and provides an integrated framework for undertaking capstone projects, which adopts a project and problem-based learning methodology, focuses on teamwork and exposes students to cultural, scientific and technical diversity. The EPS package is organised around one central module – the EPS project – and a set of complementary supportive modules on team building, project management, ethics and deontology, marketing and communication. The project proposals refer to multidisciplinary real world problems, i.e., draw on knowledge from diverse engineering fields, and are open, i.e., specify exclusively top level requirements such as the compliance with the applicable directives/norms and the budget. The students are organised in teams composed of four to six students from diverse engineering, business and industrial design backgrounds and nationalities and each team is fully responsible for conducting its project. Finally, in the EPS context, project supervision becomes coaching and, in the case of [4], coaching by a panel of experts from multiple scientific areas. EPS not only addresses multidisciplinary problem-solving and teamwork, but fosters communication, creativity, leadership, entrepreneurial thinking, ethical reasoning and global contextual analysis as recommended by [5]. As a result, we propose that CDIO should integrate the EPS framework for the benefit of 1st and 2nd cycle engineering capstone students, resulting in a marriage in the best interest of engineering education.

Abstract word count: 465

Keywords: engineering education, project-based learning, problem-based learning, student-centred learning, multicultural teamwork, multidisciplinary teamwork.

References 1. Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., Edström, K.: Rethinking Engineering Education. Springer International Publishing (2014) 2. Costa, A., Martins, Â., Rodrigues, F., Rocha, J.: CDIO@ISEP: "a stairway to heaven" (a CDIO contribution to EUR-ACE certification). In: Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. (2012) 3. Andersen, A.: Preparing engineering students to work in a global environment to co-operate, to communicate and to compete. European Journal of Engineering Education 29(4) (2004) 549-558 4. Malheiro, B., Silva, M., Ribeiro, M.C., Guedes, P., Ferreira, P.: The European Project Semester at ISEP: the challenge of educating global engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education (ahead-of-print) (2014) 1-19 5. Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Committee on Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering: Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academies Press (2005)

Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, China, June 8-11 2015

Authors (New): 
Benedita Malheiro
Manuel Silva
Paulo Ferreira
Pedro Guedes
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Portugal
Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto (ISEP), Portugal
Keywords: 
Engineering education
Project-Based Learning
Student-centered learning
multicultural teamwork
multidisciplinary teamwork
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2015
Reference: 
Abata, D.L., Andersen, A. & Krause, W.B. (2013). Transatlantic Interaction with European Project Semester. Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, USA, American Society for Engineering Education.: 
Andersen, A. (2001). Implementation of engineering product design using international student teamwork to comply with future needs. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 179-186.: 
Andersen, A. (2004). Preparing engineering students to work in a global environment to co-operate, to communicate and to compete. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 549-558.: 
Andersen, A. (2012), The European Project Semester: A useful teaching method in engineering education. Project Approaches to Learning in Engineering Education. SensePublishers, 15-28.: 
Ashworth, D.W.C. (2011). Project-based learning in international teams – monitoring the effectiveness of teamwork. Key Engineering Materials 450, 581-584.: 
Berggren, K.F., Brodeur, D. & Crawley, E.F., Ingemarsson, I., Litant, W.T.G., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S. (2003). CDIO: An international initiative for reforming engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 2.: 
Brennan, R.W., Hugo, R.J. & Gu, P. (2013). Reinforcing skills and building student confidence through a multicultural project-based learning experience. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 19(1), 75-85: 
Brodeur, D.R., Young, P.W. & Blair, K.B. (2002). Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, 16–19.: 
Chang, P.-F. & Wang, D.-C. (2011). Cultivating Engineering Ethics and Critical Thinking: a Systematic and Crosscultural Education Approach Using Problem-based Learning. European Journal of Engineering Education 36(4), 377–390: 
Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Committee on Engineering Education & National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. National Academies Press.: 
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R. & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.: 
Edström, K. & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education 39(5), 539–555.: 
Hansen, J. (2010). European Project Semester – how engineering students can achieve important competences. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on engineering education, 1296-1298.: 
Jollands, M., Jolly, L. & Molyneaux, T. (2012). Project-based Learning as a Contributing Factor to Graduates’ Work Readiness. European Journal of Engineering Education 37(2), 143–154.: 
Lingling, G., Guowei, T., Yu, F., Jinghui, L. & Wanping, Z. (2012). Research and Practice on CDIObased Application-oriented Practical Teaching System of Computer Major. IERI Procedia 2, 24 – 29.: 
Lunev, A., Petrova, I. & Zaripova, V. (2013). Competency-based models of learning for engineers: a comparison. European Journal of Engineering Education 38(5) 543–555. : 
Malheiro, B., Silva, M., Ribeiro, M.C., Guedes, P., Ferreira, P. (2014). The European Project Semester at ISEP: the challenge of educating global engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education (ahead-of-print) 1-19: 
Malheiro, B., Silva, M., Ribeiro, M.C., Guedes, P. & Ferreira, P. (2013). The European project semester at ISEP learning to learn engineering. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education, 1-8.: 
Mills, J.E. & Treagust, D.F. (2003). Engineering Education – Is Problem-based or Project-based Learning the Answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 3 (2003) 2–16.: 
Nicolaou, I. & Conlon, E. (2012). What Do Final Year Engineering Students Know about Sustainable Development?. European Journal of Engineering Education 37(3): 267–277.: 
Pee, S.H. & Leong, H. (2005). Implementing project based learning using CDIO concepts. Proceedings of 1st Annual CDIO Conference, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada. : 
Rohaert, S., Baelus, C. & Lacko, D. (2012). Project Work on Wellbeing in Multidisciplinary Student Teams: A Triple Testimonial on EPS at ARTESIS. International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, ARTESIS University College, Antwerp, Belgium.: 
Rossiter, J. A. (2013). Case Studies in Making Assessment Efficient While Developing Student Professionalism and Managing Transition. European Journal of Engineering Education 38(6): 582–594.: 
Rydhagen, B. & Dackman, C. (2011). Integration of Sustainable Development in Sanitary Engineering Education in Sweden. European Journal of Engineering Education 36(1): 87–95.: 
Savin-Baden, M., & Howell Major, C. (2004). Foundations Of Problem-Based Learning. McGraw-Hill International.: 
Segalàs, J., Benson, P. & Esbrí, M.E. (2011). European Project Semester: 30 ECTS of PBL in Sustainability with Multicultural and Multidisciplinary Bachelor Student Groups. Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Engineering Education, Belfast, Ireland.: 
Takemata, K., Kodaka, A., Minamidei, A. & Nakamura, S. (2013). Engineering project-based learning under the CDIO concept. Proceeding of 2013 IEEE International Conference on the Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, IEEE, 258–261.: 
Zhou, C. (2012). Integrating creativity training into Problem and Project-Based Learning curriculum in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education 37(5), 488-499.: 
Go to top
randomness