DIGITAL TOOLS FOR SELF_STUDY AND EXAMINATION

DIGITAL TOOLS FOR SELF_STUDY AND EXAMINATION

K. Onufrey, M. Berglund, D. Bienkowska, T. Magnusson, C. Norrman (2019).  DIGITAL TOOLS FOR SELF_STUDY AND EXAMINATION. 10.

Digitalization and increased use of information and communication technology (ICT) are major change processes taking place in engineering education today. Self-study and examination are areas with high potential for beneficial use of digital ICT tools. Some advantages with such tools are that students' can continuously assess their own learning in relation to the course objectives while they also can provide an opportunity to meet the teachers' needs to control how the students absorb the course material. Moreover, automatic provision of quick or instant feedback through digital tools can stimulate students’ commitment and active learning and allow students greater flexibility in their learning process, with tests that can be conducted online regardless of time and space and can be repeated as needed. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how different types of ICT-based self-study and examination practices can be implemented in courses on topics such as project management, product development, and entrepreneurship, and build a knowledge base necessary for future systematic implementation of digital examinations. Our study is based on an educational development project at Linköping University, where we tested and evaluated different models and approaches for digital knowledge testing in a number of selected courses. We discuss both positive and potentially problematic aspects of the use of digital tools and conclude that successful implementation is dependent on well-planned integration of such tools into the overall course where different types of activities enhance each other. Thus, this study connects the areas of digital self- study and examination and provides examples of first steps on the way towards implementation of ICT-based examination practices. 

Authors (New): 
Ksenia Onufrey
Martina Berglund
Dzamila Bienkowska
Thomas Magnusson
Charlotte Norrman
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Keywords: 
Digital tools
ICT-based self-study
self-assessment
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2019
Reference: 
Ang, C. K., Embi, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2012). Incorporating ICT tools in an active engagement strategy-based classroom to promote learning awareness and self-monitoring. International Education Studies, 5(4), 139. : 
Berggren, B., Fili, A., & Nordberg, O. (2015). Digital examination in higher education-Experiences from three different perspectives. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(3), 100. : 
Bhadani, K., Stöhr, C., Hulthén, E., Quist, J., Bengtsson, M., Evertsson, M., & Malmqvist, J. (2017). STUDENTS PERSPECTIVES ON VIDEO-BASED LEARNING IN CDIO-BASED PROJECT COURSES. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, Canada.: 
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. S.-k. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University : What the Student Does. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.: 
Blackmon, S., & Major, C. (2017). Wherefore Art Thou MOOC: Defining Massive Open Online Courses. Online Learning Journal, 21(4).: 
Bohgard, M., Karlsson, S., Lovén, E., Mikaelsson, L.-Å., Mårtensson, L., Osvalder, A.-L., Rose, L. & Ulfvengren, P. (2011). Work and technology on human terms, Stockholm: Prevent.: 
Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187.: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W. A., & Brodeur, D. R. (2011). The CDIO syllabus v2. 0. An updated statement of goals for engineering education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.: 
Heap, N. W., Kear, K. L., & Bissell, C. C. (2004). An overview of ICT-based assessment for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 241-250. : 
Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). : 
June, H. T., & Leong, H. (2006). Implications of E-Learning on Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. 2nd International CDIO Conference, Linköping, Sweden.: 
Lagerström, G., Bohgard, M., Eklund, J., Mikaelsson, L- Å., Osvalder, A-L., Rask, K. & Tikka, D. (2017). Development of the online course “Work and Technology on Human Terms”. Proceedings for NES 2017 Joy at Work, Lund, Sweden.: 
Mostert, M., & Quinn, L. (2009). Using ICTs in teaching and learning: Reflections on professional development of academic staff. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 5(5), 72-84.: 
Muianga, X., Klomsri, T., Tedre, M., & Mutimucuio, I. (2018). From Teacher-Oriented to Student-Centred Learning: Developing an ICT-Supported Learning Approach at the Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2).: 
Osvalder, A-L. & Berglund, M. (2018). On Human Terms – Integration of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) in Ergonomics in University Courses. Proceedings of the 20th Triennial Congress of the IEA, Florence, Italy.: 
Viksilä, R. (2013). Effectiveness of Video Lecturing Technology in ICT Learning. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts. : 
Go to top
randomness