REVERSE ENGINEERING AND INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING DESIGN

REVERSE ENGINEERING AND INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING DESIGN

P. Siegkas (2020).  REVERSE ENGINEERING AND INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING DESIGN . Volume 2, pp.11-22.

This paper describes practical elements during two terms of a first-year module within which CDIO standards are implemented. The aim of this practical module is for students to practice their fundamental knowledge and develop the required skills to complete projects that are structured according to industry standards. Several skills are involved in working within a professional engineering environment, beyond the strictly technical knowledge. The intention is to make the students also aware of these skills. During the first term of year one, the module includes a team-based reverse engineering project. Students are assigned to teams and given an appliance. They are expected to conceptually and physically deconstruct the device and analyze the relevant aspects of both of its parts and as a whole. Aspects would include scientific principles related to function, design considerations, the context of use, etc. The teams will then propose improvements on individual parts and the device as a whole, in terms of either function, price, manufacturing, or sustainability. The work is presented to the class and compiled into a group report. During the second term, the students are trained in design software (Autodesk Fusion 360 CAD, CAE, CAM), including basic finite element simulation, and are given two design tasks. The first is to use laser cutting to design a small wooden bridge based on certain specifications (e.g., dimensions, load-bearing), including some aesthetic elements, using limited resources (i.e., material allowance). The second is to design and optimize (in terms of mass) a support structure of certain dimensions and load-bearing capacity. The structures are then manufactured and assembled, i.e., laser-cut, and 3D printed correspondingly, weighted and tested for their load-bearing capacity. Assessment is based on a relevant portfolio. Throughout the two terms, lectures are delivered on project management and product development, as well as case studies by guest lecturers of various engineering fields. The module has been very well received with high student ratings in relevant surveys.

Authors (New): 
Petros Siegkas
Pages: 
Volume 2, pp.11-22
Affiliations: 
Nottingham Trent University, UK
Keywords: 
Introduction to Engineering
Design Process
CAD/CAE/CAM
Active learning
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO standard 4
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Ashwin, P., Boud, D., Coate, K., Hallett, F., & Keane, E. (2015). Reflective teaching in higher education. Bloomsbury Publishing. : 
Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at University: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education (UK): 
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC. : 
Brame, C., & Director, C. A. (2016). Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching, : 
Deshler, J. M., & Burroughs, E. A. (2013). Teaching mathematics with women in mind. Notices of the AMs, 60(9): 
Deweck, O. L., Kim, I. Y., Graff, C., Nadir, W., & Bell, A. (2005). (2005). Engineering design and rapid prototyping: a rewarding CAD/CAE/CAM and CDIO experience for undergraduates. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st Annual CDIO Conference, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, : 
Eppinger, S., & Ulrich, K. (2015). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. : 
Falchikov, N. (2013). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. Routledge. : 
Feynman, R. P., & Leighton, R. (1992). " Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman!": adventures of a curious character. Random House. : 
Haavi, T., Tvenge, N., & Martinsen, K. (2018). CDIO design education collaboration using 3D-desktop printers.: 
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. : 
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. : 
Quist, J., Bhadani, K., Bengtsson, M., Evertsson, M., Malmqvist, J., Enelund, M., & Hoffenson, S. (2017). (2017). CDIO based engineering design and optimization course. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, June 18-22, 2017. 298-314. : 
Schwartzman, L. (2010). Transcending Disciplinary Boundaries. Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning, , 21-44. : 
Thomas, L., & May, H. (2010). Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy, : 
Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the University. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5), 357-442. : 
Ashwin, P., Boud, D., Coate, K., Hallett, F., & Keane, E. (2015). Reflective teaching in higher education. Bloomsbury Publishing. Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at University: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC. Brame, C., & Director, C. A. (2016). Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching, Deshler, J. M., & Burroughs, E. A. (2013). Teaching mathematics with women in mind. Notices of the AMs, 60(9) Deweck, O. L., Kim, I. Y., Graff, C., Nadir, W., & Bell, A. (2005). (2005). Engineering design and rapid prototyping: a rewarding CAD/CAE/CAM and CDIO experience for undergraduates. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st Annual CDIO Conference, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, Eppinger, S., & Ulrich, K. (2015). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Falchikov, N. (2013). Improving assessment through student inv: 
Go to top
randomness