Assessing the Maturity Level of Teamwork Capabilities through CDIO Projects

Assessing the Maturity Level of Teamwork Capabilities through CDIO Projects

V. Truong, B. LE, D. Nguyen, M. Nguyen (2014).  Assessing the Maturity Level of Teamwork Capabilities through CDIO Projects. 18.

CDIO project is an important part of the general CDIO approach. The project is mostly used to connect relevant knowledge, to address essential requirements, to develop certain soft skills, and to help solve problems in an experimental and collective manner. Above all, the CDIO project is usually considered as the best tool to build and put together teamwork skills, which engineering students usually lack. In this paper, using data collected during the deployment of CDIO’s Capstone Projects in the Software Engineering program of DTU at various stages, we measure, assess and analyze the maturity levels of our students’ teamwork capabilities. Our measurement and assessment in this literature is based on an “in-house” rubric, which addresses key aspects of teamwork capabilities and outcomes along five dimensions of (1) shared leadership, (2) team orientation, (3) effort redundancy, (4) learning results, and (5) student’s autonomy. In addition to the rubric, we also hold interviews and focus group sessions to collect additional information from the students about what they hope to improve on their teamwork capabilities and how they perceive their maturity in teamwork capabilities after each CDIO Capstone Project. Results from this study is of great interest to schools, which are looking for ways to fasten their students’ teamwork maturity process and to balance out between the training of “hard” skills and “soft” skills in CDIO adoption.

Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 15-19 2014

Authors (New): 
Vu T Truong
Bao N LE
Duc-Man Nguyen
Minh Thang Nguyen
Pages: 
18
Affiliations: 
Duy Tan University, Vietnam
Keywords: 
Agile Software Development
CDIO
Capstone Project
Effort Redundancy
Plan-driven Development Process
Teamwork Capabilities
Team Orientation
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2014
Reference: 
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (2009). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. ABET: http://www.abet.org. : 
ACM - Association for Computing Machinery (2001). Computing Curricula 2001 - Computer Science. National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0003263: December 2001. : 
CDIO™ Initiative (2010). CDIO Standards v. 2.0. http://www.cdio.org. : 
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist , J., Ostlund, S., and Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO approach” (1st Ed.). Springer. : 
Denning, P. J. (1992). Educating the New Engineer. Communications of the ACM, 35 (12). : 
Holdsworth, A., Watty, K. and Davies, M. (2009). Developing Capstone Experiences. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne. : 
IEEE Computing Society and Association for Computing Machinery (2004). Software Engineering 2004 - Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering. National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0003263: August 2004. : 
Lingard, R. W. (2010).Teaching and Assessing Teamwork Skills in Engineering & Computer Science. U.S.: Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. : 
Moe, N. B. and Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Scrum and Team Effectiveness: Theory and Practice. Limerick, Ireland: Proc. 9th Inter. Conf. on Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, pp. 11-20. : 
Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T. and Røyrvik, E.A. (2009). Putting Agile Teamwork to the Test: A Preliminary Instrument for Empirically Assessing and Improving Agile Software Development. Business Information Processing, 31, pp. 114-123. : 
Rico, D. F. and Sayani, H. H. (2009). Use of Agile Methods in Software Engineering Education. Chicago, U.S.: Proc. Agile 2009 Conf., pp. 174-179: 
Stettina, C.J. and Heijstek, W. (2011). Five Agile Factors: Helping Self-Management to Self-Reflect. Proc. 18th European System & Software Process Improvement and Innovation Conf. Roskilde, Denmark: Communications in Computer and Information Science, 172, Springer, pp. 84-96. : 
Todd, R. H. and Magleby, S. P. (2005). Elements of a Successful Capstone Course considering the Needs of Stakeholders. Europe: European Journal of Engineering Education 30 (2), pp. 203-214. : 
Welch, R.L. (2000). Training a new generation of leader. U.S.: Journal of Leadership Studies.: 
Go to top
randomness