ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ARE EFFORTS IN SOTL REACHING THE ENGINEERING CLASSROOM?

ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ARE EFFORTS IN SOTL REACHING THE ENGINEERING CLASSROOM?

N. Nelson, R. Brennan (2018).  ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ARE EFFORTS IN SOTL REACHING THE ENGINEERING CLASSROOM? . 15.

If you were to walk into almost any engineering classroom today it would be difficult for you to differentiate it from one in 2000, 1980 or even 1960. The technology and tools may be different, but the delivery largely remains teacher-directed and lecture-based. While the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) is widely supported at most post-secondary institutions, there is little evidence that this scholarly work is reaching the engineering classroom. Similar work in Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER) also appears to be going unimplemented. This descriptive study examines the level to which engineering faculty at Canadian institutions are accessing and applying the findings of SoTL and DBER work within their classrooms. 

Authors (New): 
Nancy Nelson
Robert W Brennan
Pages: 
15
Affiliations: 
University of Calgary, Canada
Keywords: 
SoTL
Engineering education
Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER)
evidencebased teaching
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2018
Reference: 
Adams, K. A., & Lawrence, E. K. (2015). Research Methods, Statistics, and Applications (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.: 
Borrego, M. (2007). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods. Journal of Engineering Education, (April), 91–102. : 
https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p735
Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45–76. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20038
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press.: 
Brennan, R., Hugo, R., Johnston, K., Nelson, N., Paul, R. M., & Sullivan, M. (2018). A Systematic Review of Canadian Engineering Education Research 2014-2017. CEEA Conference Proceedings 2018, Manuscript.: 
Britnell, J., Brockerhoff-Macdonald, B., Carter, L., Dawson, D., Doucet, L., Evers, F., … Wilson, J. (2010). University faculty engagement in teaching development activities Phase 2.: 
CEEA. (2018). About CEEA. Retrieved January 12, 2018, from https://ceea.ca/en/about/: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education (2nd ed.). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. : 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 05561-9
Dancy, M., Henderson, C., & Turpen, C. (2016). How faculty learn about and implement researchbased instructional strategies: The case of Peer Instruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–17. : 
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010110
Devita, P. (2012). A short history of PEO ’ s beginnings. Engineering Dimensions, (January/February), 26–28.: 
Dolan, E. L., Elliott, S. L., Henderson, C., Curran-Everett, D., St. John, K., & Ortiz, P. A. (2017). Evaluating Discipline-Based Education Research for Promotion and Tenure. Innovative Higher Education, pp. 1–9.: 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9406-y
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of Good Practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121–125. : 
https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.121?ref=no-xroute:54808139928e66965e8d0a81d89feef7
Froyd, J. E., Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Henderson, C., & Prince, M. J. (2013). Estimates of use of research-based instructional strategies in core electrical or computer engineering courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 393–399. : 
https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2244602
Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(SPL CONTENT), 1344–1360. : 
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190167
Gonzalez-Rubio, R., Khoumsi, A., Dubois, M., & Trovao, J. P. (2016). Problem- and Project-Based Learning in Engineering: A Focus on Electrical Vehicles. 2016 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, VPPC 2016 - Proceedings. : 
https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2016.7791756
Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2), 1–14. : 
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102
Kaupp, J., Doré, S., Fostaty Young, S., Frank, B., Ostafichuk, P., McCahan, S., & Nesbit, S. (2015). The Canadian Engineering Education Association Research Collaboration (CEEA-RC): Annual Survey of Canadian Engineering Instructors. CEEA Conference Proceedings 2015, 1–12. Retrieved from Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan, June 28 – July 2, 2018. https://www.academia.edu/31631785/The_Canadian_Engineering_Education_Association_Rese arch_Collaboration_CEEA-RC_Annual_Survey_of_Canadian_Engineering_Instructors: 
Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness, 45(3), 214–222.: 
Litzinger, T. A., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R. G., & Newstetter, W. C. (2011). Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00006.x
McLaren, H. J., & Kenny, P. L. (2015). Motivating change from lecture-tutorial modes to less traditional forms of teaching. Australian Universities Review, 57(1), 26–33.: 
Morris, G. A. (1986). Engineering education in Canada: the early years. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 13, 25–32. : 
https://doi.org/10.1166/asem.2015.1727
National guideline on the practice of engineering in Canada. (2012). Ottawa. Retrieved from https://engineerscanada.ca/publications/national-guideline-on-the-practice-of-engineering-incanada#-introduction: 
Nelson, N. (2014). Achieving graduate attributes through project-based learning. In Conference Proceedings, Canadian Engineering Education Conference 2014 (pp. 1–7). Calgary, AB. Retrieved from http://library.queensu.ca/ojs/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/5923/5645: 
Reynolds, T. S., & Seely, B. E. (1993). Striving for Balance: A Hundred Years of the American Society for Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(3), 136–151. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1993.tb00092.x
Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing Response Rate and Nonreponse bias in Web and Paper Surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409–432. : 
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870
Simmons, N., & Poole, G. (2016). The History of SoTL in Canada: Answering Calls for Action. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (146), 13–22. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/tl
Singer, S. R., Neilsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2012). Discipline-Based Education Research : Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.: 
Streveler, R. A., Borrego, M., & Smith, K. A. (2007). Moving from the “Scholarship of Teaching and Learning” to “Educational Research”: An Example from Engineering. To Improve the Academy, 25, 139–149. Retrieved from https://karlsmithmn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/StrevelerBorrego-Smith-2007_vfinal full paper.pdf: 
Tierney, A. M. (2017). Threshold Concepts in Academic Practice: Engagement with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 165–184. Retrieved from http://community.dur.ac.uk/pestlhe.learning/index.php/pestlhe/article/view/167/188: 
Woods, D. R. (1996). Problem-based learning for large classes in chemical engineering. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68(68), 91–99. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966813
Wuetherick, B., Yu, S., & Greer, J. (2016). Exploring the SoTL Landscape at the University of Saskatchewan. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (146), 63–70. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/tl
Yellowley, I., Venter, R. D., & Salustri, F. A. (2001). The Canadian Design Engineering Network [ CDEN / RCCI ]: enrichment of the teaching and practice of engineering design within Canadian universities . In Proc. 2001 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference, Florida (p. 14).: 
Go to top
randomness