Key factors affecting knowledge transfer success in CDIO project designation

Key factors affecting knowledge transfer success in CDIO project designation

W. Xiang, Q. Gai, X. Mingyuan, Q. Wu, X. Wu (2014).  Key factors affecting knowledge transfer success in CDIO project designation. 10.

ABSTRACT Through the intensive involvement of implication CDIO in teaching procedure, more specific projects are designed to fulfill specific training purpose including knowledge transferring, team-working, practical application etc. Based on theory of knowledge transfer, Structural Equation Model is built for measuring students’ achieving level corresponding to different impact factor. Each impact factor is delineated as model and related hypotheses, including knowledge context, relational context, recipient context and activity context. The factors are : Whether theoretical analysis project is better than practical application project for knowledge transferring? Whether project for small group rather than project for single student is better for knowledge transferring? Hierarchical regression analysis is used to analyze the data from collected survey questionnaire of 200 senior engineering students in Digital Image Processing class. Besides this, academic score is also involved for quantitative accessment. Key word CDIO, Knowledge transfer; Project designation;

Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 15-19 2014

Authors (New): 
Wu Xiang
Qiuyan Gai
Xie Mingyuan
Qian Wu
Xi Wu
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Chengdu University of Information Technology, China
Keywords: 
Knowledge transfer
CDIO Project designation
Questionnaire survey
Year: 
2014
Reference: 
Alexander,P.A.(2000). “Toward a model of academic development: schooling and the acquisition of knowledge.” Educational Research 29(2): 28-33 : 
Abernathy, W.J, Utterback, J.M, 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Research policy 14,3-22 Bersman, H.,Birkinshaw, J.M.,Nobel,R,1999.Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies30 (3),343-378 : 
Hakanson, L.,Nobel,R.,1998.Technology Characteristics and reverse technology transfer .In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the academy of international business, Vienna, Austria. : 
Lippman, S.A., Rumelt, R.1982. Uncertain Imitability: an analysis of inter-firm differences in efficiency under compition.Bell Journal of Economics 13,418-438 : 
Moreland,R.L., Argote,L., Kirshnan, R.2006. Socially shared cognition at work:transactive memory and group performance. In: Nye,J.L.Brower, A.M.,what’s so social about social cognition?Social Cognition research in small groups. Sage, Thousand Oaks,CA,PP.57-84. : 
Stewart, T.A.,1996 The invisible key to success. Fortune,5 August,173-176.: 
Go to top
randomness